Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Dealing with Piracy and Ethics in Music and Movies




Privacy is typically an act of robbery or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed on land, in the air, or in other major bodies of water or on a shore.





Not that type of piracy! Arrrrrgh.


We aren't talking about the type of piracy that involves cannons, a ship, and a booty. We are talking about the kind of piracy that many of us have taken part in.  

What is piracy?

Piracy is defined as the unauthorized duplication and distribution of intellectual property in any of its various forms.


I'm sure many of you are familiar with this video:



Now that we have defined piracy let's take a look and see who is involved:


the pirate {har har} aka us, those dowloading and filesharing

and

the original content creators such as artists, producers, actors, directors, etc.


According to the Recording Industry Association of America, piracy in music alone is a huge problem. Here are some statistics directly from their website:


  • Since peer-to-peer (p2p) file-sharing site Napster emerged in 1999, music sales in the U.S. have dropped 53 percent, from $14.6 billion to $7.0 billion in 2011.

  • From 2004 through 2009 alone, approximately 30 billion songs were illegally downloaded on file-sharing networks.

  • NPD reports that only 37 percent of music acquired by U.S. consumers in 2009 was paid for.


  • Digital storage locker downloads constitute 7 percent of all Internet traffic, while 91 percent of the links found on them were for copyrighted material, and 10 percent of those links were to music specifically, according to a 2011 Envisional study.



How does this impact the economy? 

House Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) cited the U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimate that trade in counterfeit goods is responsible for an annual loss of 750,000 jobs in the United States. 750,000 jobs?! We are already sitting at a lovely 7.5% unemployment rate. That is SEVEN HUNDER AND FIFTY THOUSAND people. Who have families. Children. Pets. Homes. As if knowing that piracy is illegal isn't enough, think about the people who are hurting as a result!



What are the pros & cons?




What are the laws & consequences of piracy?

"Making unauthorized copies of copyrighted music recordings is against the law and may subject you to civil and criminal liability.  A civil law suit could hold you responsible for thousands of dollars in damages. Criminal charges may leave you with a felony record, accompanied by up to five years of jail time and fines up to $250,000. You may find this surprising. After all, compact discs may be easily be copied multiple times with inexpensive CD-R burning technology.  Further, when you’re on the Internet, digital information can seem to be as free as air.  U.S. copyright law does in fact provide full protection of sound recordings, whether they exist in the form of physical CD’s or digital files.  Regardless of the format at issue, the same basic principal applies:  music sound recordings may not be copied or distributed without the permission of the owner."
-RIAA 

Let's see here...we {the pirates}, have not only make 750,000 people lose their jobs annually, but in doing so we could face five years of jail, a $250,000 fine, and felony criminal charges?! 

Gee whiz that 3 minute song is sure worth downloading illegally.....NOT.


Future Implications?
I believe that piracy may never stop completely, with new technologies and file sharing software  emerging each year.  At the same time, I believe the RIAA, the US government, and individual lobbyists will continue to fight the war on piracy as much as possible. I will leave you today with a quote from the RIAA which I believe is quite powerful:

"Better to be safe than sorry – don’t assume that downloading or burning is legal just because technology makes it possible."












References:










Friday, May 10, 2013

Potential Dangers & Benefits of Children Using Social Media

Most of us are familiar with social media.

Some examples include: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Myspace, Vine, Blogger, Reddit, and Pinterest. 

Although there are privacy settings, and supposed 13+ restrictions on websites, social media is on the rise in children and teens. So much so that a recent survey concluded that 25% of nine year olds are using some type of social media.

How does this impact society? 
A clinical research study was recently conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics on Social Media and the impact on children, adolescents, and their families. This study revealed that now more than ever children are experiencing a wealth of bullying via the web. Twenty years ago words such as "sexting" and "cyberbullying" had no meaning to most, but unfortunately kids have found a new way to bully and these are terms that are all to fresh in our minds. Another study reported how children are now valuing fame much higher than before as a result of social media; this particular study focused on Facebook. It concluded that because children are posting photos and statuses for likes and snares as a result the children are valuing fame more than ever. In my opinion this article hits the nail on the head. I have a 14 year old sister who's emotions go haywire while on Facebook. If someone posts a better outfit or pair of shoes, she has to compete with them. Although it sounds childish {because it is}, isn't this something we all do from time to time? I know I catch myself comparing my life to others on Facebook and other social media sites. Specifically Pinterest. The housewives who make everything from scratch, including baby clothes and decor, all while having a spotless home. I could never keep up with that!
There are some potential benefits:
 *children building their social skills and ability to make decisions on their own
*discovering information that they do not feel comfortable discussing with their parents such as birth control, depression, and sexually transmitted diseases.

  How does this impact the future? 
More and more children are online, what needs to be done next appears to be in the hands of parents and monitoring their children online. I personally agree with the article which talked about children’s privacy. There is a difference between surveillance and parental controls. I will most certainly do my best to block websites, web searches, etc which have inappropriate content for my children, but I do not need to know every single thing they have searched for and make them play it back to me play by play. My parents had an authoritarian way of life and although I didn’t go through a rebellious stage when I moved out, both my sister and brothers are currently experiencing it.

 This also impacts the future because children can use social media:
 -as a form of activism
 -to redefine boundaries between students and teachers {this is true at my previous high school. Although our district never set boundaries themselves, the teachers wouldn't accept friend requests until we were graduated.}
-redifining parent communication {The article shares a link here to go to the story about Horry County School District, where they now have a Digital Communications Coordinator} http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=535617#.UYpZWLWG3To
^here's the link to that story Also in the Horry County story, the article mentions that 40% of Facebook users are under the age of 25.


 Finally, I would like to share a video I found via YouTube about social media and children.


 

   References
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/4/800.full 
Ellen Niemer, (2012). Teenagers and Social Media. Alive: Canada's Natural Health & Wellness Magazine. 359 (), pp.20-29 
^can be found via OHIOLINK, but link will not work 

Jason Nolan, Kate Raynes-Goldie, Melanie McBride, (2011). The Stranger Danger: Exploring Surveillance, Autonomy, and Privacy in Children's Use of Social Media.. Canadian Children. 36 (e.g. 2), pp.24-32 
^can be found via OHIOLINK but link to full text pdf will not work

 Sally Quinn, Julian A. Oldmeadow, (2012). Is the igeneration a ‘we’ generation? Social networking use among 9- to 13-year-olds and belonging. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 31 (e.g. 2), pp.136-142 
^can be found via OHIOLINK but link to full text pdf isn’t working